Inverse 3D Microscopy Rendering for Embryo Shape Inference with Active Mesh
ICCV 2025
- Sacha Ichbiah1
- Anshuman Sinha1,2
- Fabrice Delbary1
- Hervé Turlier1
1 Collège de France, CNRS, INSERM, PSL University
2 Université Paris Cité
Overview
deltaMic is a CUDA-based differentiable 3D renderer for fluorescence microscopy. It models image formation as a Fourier-space convolution between the microscope’s point spread function (PSF) and a triangular mesh representation of the specimen. By jointly optimizing mesh geometry and optical parameters directly from raw images, deltaMic achieves robust 3D reconstruction without labeled training data or priors.

Figure 1 - deltaMic pipeline overview.
Methodology
Microscopy rendering is modeled as:
I(x) = (uΛ * h)(x) = ∫ uΛ(p) h(x - p) d³p
and equivalently in Fourier space as:
I(x) = 𝔽⁻¹[ûΛ · ĥ](x)
, reducing computational complexity from O(n⁶) to O(n³·log(n³)).
Starting from an initial mesh, deltaMic iteratively updates both vertex coordinates and PSF parameters to minimize the weighted image difference between rendered and experimental microscopy data.

Figure 2 - Active mesh optimization over successive iterations.
Results Across Species
deltaMic accurately reconstructs early-stage embryo morphologies across species and imaging modalities.

Figure 3 - Inferred cellular geometries for ascidian, mouse, and C. elegans embryos.
Supplementary Video - Shape inference and synthetic rendering convergence.
Benchmarking
To assess generality, deltaMic was compared against DM3D, a leading active-mesh segmentation framework implemented as a Fiji plug-in.

Figure 4 - Comparison between DM3D and deltaMic on 3D mouse organoid data.
deltaMic demonstrates improved reconstruction of multicellular membrane structures while maintaining photometric fidelity. Performance on nucleus-only datasets is limited due to design assumptions targeting multicellular surfaces.
Discussion
deltaMic bridges physics-based rendering and inverse modeling in biological imaging. This approach enables quantitative analysis of morphogenesis by linking observed fluorescence to underlying 3D geometry and optical parameters.
Current limitations
- Dependence on an adequate initial mesh
- Computational load for large volumetric datasets
Ongoing directions
- Automated mesh initialization
- Temporal morphodynamic inference (tension, curvature, pressure)
- Integration with biophysical simulation pipelines
Citation
@InProceedings{deltamic_2025_ICCV, author = {Sacha Ichbiah and Anshuman Sinha and Fabrice Delbary and Hervé Turlier}, title = {Inverse 3D Microscopy Rendering for Cell Shape Inference with Active Mesh}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)}, month = {October}, year = {2025}, pages = {27466-27475} }
© 2025 Anshuman Sinha | Last updated: Oct. 16, 2025